Keeta Vaccaro returned to social media this week just days after a judge criticised her spending during divorce proceedings with Tyreek Hill, offering a clear signal that the public scrutiny has not pushed her out of the spotlight.
Vaccaro is in the midst of a high-profile divorce from Tyreek Hill, the star wideout for the Miami Dolphins. While the legal case continues to unfold in Florida, Vaccaro shared gym footage on her Instagram story, presenting a calm and confident image despite recent courtroom setbacks.
The financial details emerging from the case have been substantial. Court filings in Miami-Dade County, cited by the Daily Mail, show that Hill has been ordered to provide Vaccaro with between $20,000 and $50,000 in discretionary spending, in addition to a one-time payment of $500,000.
Those payments came on top of money Hill had already transferred voluntarily. According to court documents, Vaccaro received a total of $714,000 prior to the most recent ruling. That figure included $500,000 for legal fees, $100,000 earmarked as a car allowance, another $100,000 issued as a lump sum, and $17,500 designated for child support.
Court limits support after raising spending concerns
Despite the scale of those payments, the court took issue with how the funds were being used. During the proceedings, a judge sharply criticised Vaccaro‘s financial decisions, describing them as excessive given the circumstances of the case.
Among the concerns highlighted was her use of nearly the entire $100,000 car allowance to purchase a Bentley. Court records show Vaccaro added $96,000 to complete the deal, bringing the vehicle’s total cost to $196,000. She was also criticised for spending $36,000 on business ventures, moving $60,000 into an investment account, and paying off her Tesla.
As a result, the court declined to approve any additional discretionary support and limited temporary spousal payments to $5,500 per month. The ruling marked a clear effort to rein in further spending while the divorce remains unresolved.
Even so, Vaccaro‘s social media activity suggested little concern about the judge’s remarks. Her gym post, shared shortly after the ruling, quickly drew attention due to its timing and tone, reinforcing the perception that she remains largely unfazed by the legal criticism.
Read the full article here
