A groundbreaking scientific initiative to bring back extinct animals has gained star-studded support, with Tom Brady and Tiger Woods joining forces with Colossal Biosciences. The biotechnology company, which specializes in de-extinction efforts, aims to restore species such as the woolly mammoth, the dodo bird, and the Tasmanian tiger.
Their involvement brings a new level of public attention and credibility to this emerging field of genetic engineering and species revival.
Colossal Biosciences, co-founded by renowned geneticist George Church and entrepreneur Ben Lamm, has been a pioneer in the de-extinction movement.
Using CRISPR gene-editing technology, the company works to insert DNA from extinct species into the genomes of their closest living relatives. The woolly mammoth project is the most advanced of these efforts, with scientists modifying the DNA of Asian elephants-who share 99.6 percent of their genetic material with the mammoth-to recreate the species.
A similar approach is being used to revive the dodo bird by altering the genes of the Nicobar pigeon, the dodo’s closest surviving relative.
High-profile support and growing public interest
The decision by Brady and Woodsto invest in Colossal Biosciences underscores a growing interest among celebrities in supporting technological innovations and environmental conservation.
For Brady, backing a cutting-edge scientific venture aligns with his fascination with innovation. Woods, whose philanthropic efforts span various causes, is leveraging his influence to advocate for advancements in biotechnology.
Their financial backing and public endorsement not only provide a boost to Colossal’s funding but also raise awareness of de-extinction as a serious scientific endeavor. With a growing number of investors and researchers working to restore lost species, the prospect of seeing creatures like the woolly mammoth walk the earth again is becoming more plausible.
Despite its ambitious goals, the concept of de-extinction remains highly controversial. Many conservationists and scientists question the wisdom of reintroducing species that have been absent from ecosystems for thousands of years.
Critics argue that resurrecting extinct animals could create unforeseen ecological disruptions, particularly in environments that have since adapted to their absence. Others contend that resources dedicated to de-extinction projects might be better spent on preserving species that are currently endangered.
Read the full article here
