Errol Segal, an 81-year-old lifelong Los Angeles Dodgers fan, recently found himself at odds with his favorite team after a half-century of unwavering support.
Having held season tickets for 50 years, Segal expected that his loyalty would be enough to secure his seat for the 2026 season. Instead, he was told to either download the MLB Ballpark app or stay home.
“For the first time in decades, I might have to skip games entirely,” Segal lamented to local reporters, holding up his old flip phone that cannot accommodate modern apps. “Fifty years I’ve had these tickets. They threw me under the bus.”
The Dodgers, valued at roughly $7.8 billion to $8 billion, have enforced a strict digital-only ticketing policy, citing the prevention of fraud and ticket scalping as their justification.
While digital ticketing has become increasingly standard across professional sports, Segal’s situation exposes the limitations of a purely tech-based system.
Despite offering to pay extra for paper tickets, the team refused to make an exception, leaving the longtime fan with few options.
Segal, a South Los Angeles business owner, noted that while he could purchase a paper ticket for a single game at the stadium, the team would not accommodate his full season.
“If I had the tickets one year, five years, 10 years, that’s another story,” Segal said. “Fifty years I’ve had these tickets. They threw me under the bus.”
Digital convenience versus decades of loyalty
The controversy quickly caught attention on social media, with many weighing in on whether loyalty or convenience should take precedence.
Some argue that fans like Segal simply need guidance in navigating new technology. “Will someone show this poor man how to store and use digital tickets? It’s infinitely easier than carrying paper tix,” tweeted Jason Boyce.
Others, however, criticized the Dodgers for failing to accommodate a lifelong supporter.
Season ticket holders who remember a time before QR codes and mobile apps argue that an exception for Segal would have been a small but meaningful gesture of goodwill.
Critics point out that even within tech-driven policies, flexibility for longtime fans can preserve both the team’s reputation and the personal connection with supporters.
The situation has left Segal in limbo. While the team offered a refund for his seats, he rejected the offer, saying, “I said, ‘That’s not fair.'” Many fans sympathize with Segal’s predicament, noting that paper tickets have historically been a staple for generations of baseball enthusiasts.
This incident also highlights a broader tension in sports today: the push toward fully digital experiences versus the practical realities of an aging fanbase.
While apps streamline operations and reduce fraud, they can inadvertently alienate dedicated supporters who helped build the team’s legacy.
For now, Errol Segal remains a devoted fan in principle, but without a solution to his digital dilemma, even a 50-year legacy with the Dodgers may not be enough to see him through the 2026 season.
His story is a stark reminder that in the age of apps and QR codes, loyalty does not always guarantee entry.
Read the full article here
