The Cleveland Browns entered training camp with no mystery about who would lead their offense into Week 1.
Head coachKevin Stefanskimade it clear that veteran Joe Flacco, fresh off a late-season resurgence, would hold the starting job.
The real intrigue, however, has centered on the competition for the role behind him.
That battle has featured a mix of storylines, names, and controversy. The Browns have cycled through a variety of options, including former first-round pick Kenny Pickett, rookie third-round selection Dillon Gabriel, and promising fifth-rounder Shedeur Sanders.
At one point, Cleveland also turned to Tyler Huntley, the ex-Ravens quarterback and one-time Pro Bowler, before releasing him earlier this month.
With roster cuts looming and the official depth chart still under wraps, speculation has been fierce.
But what has turned heads even more than the uncertainty is the criticism coming from outside the building, specifically, from a trio of former NFL stars who argue Stefanski has handled his young quarterbacks unevenly.
According to Chad Johnson, T.J. Houshmandzadeh, and Shannon Sharpe, Stefanski has put Gabriel in a favorable position to succeed while leaving Sanders at a disadvantage.
That assertion has stirred conversation, not only because it questions the fairness of the competition but also because of who is making the claim.
The backup job and the outside noise
For Cleveland, the importance of identifying a reliable backup cannot be overstated. Flacco may have steadied the Browns late last season, but at 40 years old with just six appearances in 2024, the team knows it must plan for the possibility of needing its second quarterback sooner rather than later.
The choice is hardly simple. Pickett brings starting experience from his time in Pittsburgh but has struggled with consistency.
Gabriel, the Oklahoma product, has impressed in flashes with his ability to process quickly in Stefanski‘s system.
Sanders, meanwhile, has become one of the more polarizing young quarterbacks in camp, drawing both praise for his composure and criticism for his lack of readiness against NFL speed.
The critiques from Johnson, Houshmandzadeh, and Sharpe, then, arrive at a delicate time.
Their contention that Gabriel was “set up to thrive” while Sanders was “put in a position to fail” implies something more deliberate than the natural ebb and flow of a rookie learning curve.
Skepticism, however, is warranted. Both Johnson and Houshmandzadeh are long remembered for their time with the Cincinnati Bengals, one of Cleveland‘s fiercest AFC North rivals.
Sharpe, who spent part of his career with the Baltimore Ravens, also knows the history of hostility between those franchises and the Browns.
Read the full article here
