The Chicago Sky made a bold move on Sunday, acquiring two-time WNBA All-Star Ariel Atkins from the Washington Mystics in a significant trade. While the deal signals Chicago’s intent ahead of the 2025 season, many fans were left frustrated, believing the team gave up too much in return.
As part of the trade, the Sky sent the overall third pick in the upcoming 2025 WNBA Draft to Washington, along with a second-round pick in 2027 and the right for the Mystics to swap first-round picks in the same year.
While Atkins is a proven talent with both offensive and defensive capabilities, the decision to part with a high draft selection sparked backlash among supporters who felt the team could have used it to sign a younger guard than the 28-year-old.
Atkins has been a consistent performer throughout her career, known for her ability to contribute on both ends of the floor and Sky All-Star Angel Reese expressed excitement about Atkins joining the team, suggesting that the veteran guard could bring valuable experience and leadership, to calm fans.
She averaged 12.7 points, 3.3 rebounds, and 2.4 assists per game in 2024 while providing strong perimeter defense. Her playoff experience could also be crucial for a Chicago team looking to establish itself as a contender.
Fans react to cost of trade
Ultimately, the success of this trade will depend on how well Atkins integrates into the Sky’s system and whether the team can still address other roster concerns but fans have initially been unconvinced at the news.
With the 2025 season approaching, the announcement of the trade was met with immediate criticism from Sky fans, who voiced their disappointment on social media. Many were particularly upset that the team relinquished such a valuable draft position.
One frustrated fan commented on X.com, formerly Twitter, “I been saying fire the GM. Why would you give up the 3rd pick? Jeff [Pagliocca] needs to go.”
Another fan echoed similar sentiments, writing, “Giving up the 3rd while Carter is unsigned for an ok guard is insane to me.”
And a third commented, “This was not worth the 3rd pick.”
Read the full article here