A new report from the University of Texas at El Paso is reigniting debate over whether NFL officiating has subtly benefited Patrick Mahomes and the Kansas City Chiefs.
The study’s findings suggest that referees may have unintentionally given the Chiefs an edge in critical game moments, particularly during the playoffs. The discussion gained traction following a controversial sequence in Week 6 against the Detroit Lions.
On a daring fourth-and-goal attempt from the half-yard line, Jared Goff bobbled the snap before completing a pass to himself and rushing into the end zone. What looked like a successful trick play was overturned after officials called an illegal motion penalty.
The decision left fans questioning whether the Chiefs receive more leniency-or even assistance-from referees than other teams. The debate only intensified when Kansas City finished with zero penalty yards, becoming the first team since the 1970s to do so.
To address this broader concern, three finance professors-Spencer C. Barnes, Brandon Mendez, and Ted Dischman-conducted an extensive analysis of defensive penalties across NFL games from 2015 through 2023. Their study explored whether officiating bias toward specific franchises could be statistically identified, and according to their research, the Chiefs stood out.
Barnes explained: “Increased flag throwing does seem to be concentrated just within the Chiefs, and especially within the postseason.”
Speaking to Texas Monthly, he added that while the difference “isn’t massive-typically one more penalty for the Chiefs-it’s still meaningful.”
Barnes concluded: “You might think that’s not really that big of a deal, but one more penalty could extend the drive and lead to three more points, which would win them the game.”
The study compared the Chiefs‘ numbers to those of other prominent teams-including the Tom Brady-era New England Patriots, the San Francisco 49ers, the Los Angeles Rams, and the Philadelphia Eagles-but found no comparable patterns of officiating advantage.
But the researchers were careful to emphasize that the findings show correlation, not intent.
“This is correlation; this is not causation,” Barnes clarified. “We’re not making any claims that this is a directive from the NFL. I think what we’re picking up on here is maybe some implicit bias, but there could be lots of other things going on.”
Validity of the Study and Fan Reactions
The research claims that the Chiefs benefited most from officiating in high-stakes postseason scenarios, as it also gained attention just days after Kansas City‘s 30-17 victory over the Lions, a game in which the Chiefs did not commit a single penalty.
“The fact that postseason penalties consistently favored one franchise,” Barnes added, “while similar dynasties showed no such pattern, points to the powerful role of financial incentives in shaping supposedly neutral decisions.”
The paper even suggests that when “the league’s financial health is at stake, rule enforcement may subtly shift to protect market appeal.” However, not everyone is convinced by the study’s conclusions. Critics have questioned potential bias within the research team after it was revealed that co-author Ted Dischman is an admitted Pittsburgh Steelers fan-a detail not disclosed in the publication.
That revelation has fueled skepticism among fans, particularly since the Chiefs have defeated the Steelers in key recent matchups, including a 40-22 win during the 2021/22 Wild Card round and another victory on Christmas Day in 2024.
While the findings do not accuse referees of intentional favoritism, they raise important questions about human bias, competitive fairness, and the financial stakes that underpin professional sports. For now, the report has intensified an already heated discussion among fans and analysts: are the Chiefs simply that disciplined, or have the flags quietly been falling in their favor?
Read the full article here
