The debate over the play known as the “Tush Push” has taken a controversial turn in the NFL, particularly with the dominance shown by the Philadelphia Eagles in executing it. While some franchises and former players question the ethics of the play, arguing that it could be considered unsportsmanlike or unfair, others see it as a legitimate and effective part of the game. Among these defenders is Brandon Graham, an Eagles legend, who recently made his stance on the controversial play clear.
In an appearance on the “Up and Adams” podcast, Graham, the longest-tenured player in the franchise’s history, staunchly defended the play. “I wouldn’t even think about banning it,” he said emphatically. For Graham, the Tush Push is not just another play, but a reflection of consistency and teamwork. “If we didn’t have the right personnel to execute it, then of course the opponents would stop it,” he added, emphasizing that the team’s ability to execute the play successfully is due to their lineup and strategy.
The secret behind the Tush Push
Graham not only defends the play but also highlights the league’s ability to adapt and evolve. According to him, if teams find a strategy that works, the league quickly adjusts the rules to balance the game. “This league always finds ways to adjust,” Graham said, recognizing the NFL’s ingenuity. He further added that teams must be prepared for any tactic that was effective one season to potentially fail the next year due to rivals adjusting. “If you have a good year with a play, you’d better make sure you’re consistent because they’ll come after you,” he warned, demonstrating that football is constantly evolving.
Although Graham’s playing career has ended, his passion for the Eagles and his desire to defend their legacy persist. To him, the Tush Push remains a legitimate play that reflects the team’s effort and skill, and he sees no reason for it to be removed from the NFL’s playbook. With his legacy in the team and his unique perspective, Graham has become a respected voice in this ongoing debate.
Read the full article here