Aryna Sabalenka is not backing away from the financial debate in tennis, even after the Australian Open announced its biggest prize money increase in history.
Ahead of the season’s first Grand Slam, the world number one made it clear that while players recognise progress, they do not see the issue as resolved.
Over the past year, Aryna Sabalenka has been at the forefront of a coordinated push by leading ATP and WTA players calling for fairer financial distribution across the four Grand Slams.
That effort became public in March, when players sent a joint letter to tournament organisers demanding higher prize money, improved player benefit programmes such as maternity support, and a genuine role in key decision-making processes.
A second letter followed in July, underlining the growing urgency behind those demands. Since then, the Australian Open has responded with a significant financial commitment.
For 2026, the tournament will offer a total prize pool of 111.5 million AUD, approximately 74.9 million USD. The champion’s cheque will rise to 2.79 million USD, while the runner-up will earn 1.44 million USD.
When asked for her view on the announcement, Sabalenka welcomed the step forward but stopped short of calling it a breakthrough.
“I think we can always do better,” she said.
“I think all of the Slams are trying to work together with us and come to a conclusion, and I hope one day we’ll get to a happy place for everyone.”
Players balance public praise with private pressure
Pressed further on how the Australian Open could continue to improve, Sabalenka chose not to expand, smiling as she declined to go into specifics.
“Well, I mean, can I pass?” she joked.
With negotiations ongoing between players and tournament organisers, Sabalenka seems aware that detailed public commentary could complicate delicate discussions happening behind closed doors.
Her measured tone was echoed by Coco Gauff, who also addressed the topic during her own press conference. Gauff has previously spoken about how improved prize money across all rounds strengthens the long-term health of the sport, not just the earnings of its biggest names.
This time, she acknowledged the increase while pointing out that the core issue remains unresolved.
“From my understanding, they obviously increased the prize money this year. But the percentage, I think, is still of revenue comparison is still not where we would like it… I think there are still further conversations that have to be had, not just with AO, but with all the Slams,” Gauff said.
Read the full article here
