The leadership of the National Basketball Association is under intense scrutiny after a sweeping federal investigation into illegal gambling operations involving league figures, and mounting voices now argue that Commissioner Adam Silver should step aside.
In recent days, the brilliant veneer of NBA governance has cracked. Coaches and players have been arrested in a case that alleges the use of inside information and altered performance to manipulate casino bets.
Among those charged are Chauncey Billups, now coach of the Portland Trail Blazers, and Terry Rozier of the Miami Heat.
The league’s response has thus far focused on damage control. Silver addressed the matter publicly during the Boston at New York livestream on Amazon Prime Video, saying:
“There’s nothing more important to the league and its fans than the integrity of the competition. I had a pit in my stomach. It was very upsetting.”
Yet the rhetorical acknowledgment of the crisis has not quieted criticism. Among the most vocal is former NBA player and human-rights activist Enes Kanter Freedom, who posted on X: “ADAM SILVER MUST RESIGN IMMEDIATELY. You can’t profit off gambling and then suddenly play the victim when it blows back on you.”
The key question is less about the headline arrests and more about the systemic oversight under Silver‘s stewardship.
With thousands of sports bets placed daily and partnerships between the league and sportsbooks now regular, critics argue that the architecture to protect game integrity may have been under-resourced or misguided.
What’s at stake
The 2025 gambling investigation has exposed an unsettling vulnerability in the league’s operation.
According to public records, thousands of bets, including prop bets and player performance lines, may have been influenced by non-public information.
Billups is accused of involvement in a rigged poker and sports-betting operation with ties to organized crime, while Rozier is alleged to have misled the league about an injury, contributing to wagering advantages.
Silver has defended the league’s prior investigation into Rozier, stating:
“We frankly couldn’t find anything. Terry at the time cooperated. He gave the league office his phone. He sat down for an interview. And we ultimately concluded that there was insufficient evidence despite that aberrational behavior to move forward.”
Still, for many observers, the time between reported irregularity and arrests suggests deeper questions, calling into question whether the league did enough, and whether the person at the helm should be held responsible for the league’s handling of the controversy.
Read the full article here
