NBA star Luka Doncic is now at the center of a growing international legal dispute involving his former fiancée and the custody of their children. Recent reports indicate that Doncic has asked a judge to dismiss a petition filed in California by his ex-partner, arguing that the case was brought in the wrong jurisdiction and should not proceed in that court.
The dispute involves Anamaria Goltes, who reportedly relocated back to Slovenia with the couple’s daughter while pregnant with their second child. She has remained in Slovenia since last May, raising questions about which country has legal authority over matters such as child support and custody.
The geographic separation between the two parties has added complexity to an already strained situation, with both sides now pursuing legal remedies in different jurisdictions.
Doncic, who plays for the Los Angeles Lakers, is contesting the California filing on the grounds that neither he nor his children are residents of the state.
His legal team has argued that the petition is procedurally flawed because California courts should not exercise authority over individuals who do not have a sufficient connection to the state. He has also reportedly initiated separate legal proceedings in Slovenia, suggesting that the matter is already being addressed in what he considers the appropriate legal venue.
Jurisdictional conflict and parallel legal actions
At the heart of the case is a disagreement over jurisdiction, with both parties effectively engaging legal systems in different countries. Doncic‘s position is that the California petition should be dismissed due to improper filing, while the opposing side’s actions reflect an attempt to establish legal claims within the United States.
This overlap has created a situation where courts may first need to determine which jurisdiction takes precedence before addressing substantive issues such as custody arrangements or financial obligations.
Reports also indicate that Doncic has stated he continues to cover the expenses of his two young daughters, emphasizing his ongoing financial support despite the separation. His legal filings suggest that he has made efforts to resolve custody and support matters through Slovenian courts, further reinforcing his argument that the California petition is unnecessary and duplicative.
The broader context of the dispute includes a breakdown in the couple’s relationship, which appears to have been influenced by disagreements over living arrangements and where to raise their children. The physical distance between the United States and Slovenia has only intensified these challenges, making communication and coordination more difficult.
Although tensions have been high, authorities in Slovenia reportedly found no evidence of criminal wrongdoing related to prior interactions between the two parties at a maternity hospital.
Read the full article here
