Projected No. 1 overall pick Fernando Mendoza has become the center of controversy after choosing not to throw at the NFL Combine – a decision that has divided analysts and reignited debates about media double standards.
According to reports, Mendoza will instead showcase his arm talent at Indiana’s pro day, where he can throw to familiar receivers in a scripted environment designed to highlight timing, chemistry and rhythm. The move is increasingly common among elite quarterback prospects, but this time the reaction has been noticeably louder.
Skipping combine throws is hardly unprecedented. Many top quarterbacks in recent years have opted out of the session, preferring the comfort and control of their college campus setting. At the Combine, quarterbacks often throw to unfamiliar pass catchers with limited practice time, increasing the likelihood of miscommunication that can be overanalyzed by scouts and commentators.
However, the controversy isn’t just about Mendoza’s choice – it’s about who is criticizing it.
Several media figures who previously defended similar decisions by other high-profile quarterbacks, including Shedeur Sanders, are now questioning Mendoza’s competitiveness. That inconsistency has fueled accusations of selective scrutiny within draft coverage circles.
Fans react: “Watch how they don’t treat him like Shedeur”
The online response was immediate and polarized. Many fans pointed to what they see as hypocrisy in the commentary surrounding Mendoza’s decision.
Watch how they don’t treat him like shedeur sanders.
Another added, “Smart move by Mendoza. Why throw to unfamiliar WRs at the Combine when you can control the environment at Pro Day and elevate your pass catchers?”
Supporters argue that Mendoza has little to gain and significant risk by throwing at the Combine. A single off-target pass in an unfamiliar setting can quickly dominate headlines, potentially affecting draft narratives despite strong college film.
Critics, however, suggest that elite prospects should embrace every competitive stage available. They view Combine participation as a demonstration of confidence and readiness for the professional spotlight.
Fernando Mendoza ’25:
- 2,980 YDS
- 33 TD
- 6 INT
- 71.5 CMP%
- 153.9 RTG
In reality, the decision reflects the evolving business side of the NFL Draft. Top prospects are strategic about protecting their draft stock. With millions of dollars tied to draft position, minimizing risk has become part of the process.
The debate also highlights how quickly narratives can shift. One quarterback’s “smart business move” can become another’s “lack of competitiveness” depending on perception.
As pro day approaches, Mendoza will have the opportunity to answer questions with his performance. Until then, the conversation around fairness and media treatment is likely to intensify.
Ultimately, the situation underscores a broader truth about the NFL Draft: every choice is scrutinized, and consistency in criticism often matters just as much as the decision itself.
Read the full article here
